Apps/ smart pens

Authors

  • Carolina Gómez Martin Comprehensive Center for Endocrinology and Diabetes (Cendia) Concordia, Entre Ríos, Argentina

Keywords:

Apps, smart pens, diabetes

Abstract

The integration of digital health technologies, including connected insulin pens (smart pens) and mobile health (mHealth) applications, has demonstrated benefits in the management of individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D). These technologies automatically record insulin doses, provide missed-dose reminders, integrate continuous glucose monitoring data, and support therapeutic decision-making, enabling a more personalized and data-driven approach to diabetes care.

In T1D, a recently published investigator-initiated randomized clinical trial demonstrated that the use of a connected insulin pen cap significantly reduced time spent in severe hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL), decreased glycemic variability, and improved patients' confidence in insulin administration. Among participants with high adherence, an absolute 8% increase in time in range was observed.

In T2D, the use of smart pens with active dose reminder functions has been associated with lower mean glucose levels and greater HbA1c reduction compared with conventional insulin pens. In addition, a recent meta-analysis showed that mHealth-based interventions reduce HbA1c by approximately 0.3% to 0.5%, with the greatest effect observed during the first three months of use, followed by attenuation at six months. Clinical benefits are further enhanced when mobile applications are combined with ongoing support from healthcare professionals.

Beyond improving glycemic outcomes, these technologies enhance treatment adherence, reduce dosing errors through bolus calculator functions, and have been associated with lower healthcare costs, primarily owing to reductions in hospitalizations and emergency department visits.

Despite these benefits, adoption remains limited. In countries where these technologies are available, only 4–15% of people with T1D use connected insulin pens, although healthcare professionals estimate that up to 73% could potentially benefit from them. Important implementation challenges remain, including the long-term sustainability of clinical benefits, device costs, reimbursement limitations, the digital divide, and interoperability across digital platforms.

Overall, current evidence supports the incorporation of connected insulin pens and mHealth applications as complementary tools for insulin therapy. However, additional independent, long-term studies, particularly in T2D, are needed to confirm their impact on clinical outcomes. Concurrently, efforts should focus on reducing barriers to adoption and ensuring equitable access for individuals most likely to benefit from these technologies.

Author Biography

Carolina Gómez Martin, Comprehensive Center for Endocrinology and Diabetes (Cendia) Concordia, Entre Ríos, Argentina

Doctor specializing in Diabetes

References

I. Sebastian-Valles F, Sager-La Ganga C, Justel Enriquez A, Jimenez Blanco S, Navas-Moreno V, Arranz Martin JA, et al. Analysis of glycaemic control with a connected smart pen cap in adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, parallel-group trial. Diabetologia. 2026;69(5):1191-1204.

II. Galindo RJ, Ramos C, Cardona S, Vellanki P, Davis GM, Oladejo O, et al. Efficacy of a smart insulin pen cap for the management of patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a randomized cross-over trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023;17(1):201-207.

III. Butt MD, Ong SC, Javaid I, Malik T. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness analysis of mobile health interventions in diabetes care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2026;16(1):7774. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-07774-?

IV. Mader JK, Heinemann L, Brandt D, Diem P, Ampudia-Blasco FJ, Trümpy C, et al. Smart pens: expectations regarding use and functionality from health care providers. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2026;20(4):1100-1105.

Published

2026-10-01

Issue

Section

4 Voices in 10 Minutes part 8