Does prediabetes exist?

Authors

  • Víctor Commendatore National University of the Northeast (UNNE), Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina

Keywords:

prediabetes, diagnosis

Abstract

The cutoff levels for diagnosing diabetes mellitus (DM) were established because above these levels, the frequency of diabetic retinopathy (DR) increased. However, if DR is present but is below these thresholds, does the patient already have DM? The diagnostic plasma glucose levels at 120 minutes of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) arose from studies by Pimas, Whitehall, and Bedford, which demonstrated that both DR and nephropathy occurred almost exclusively with values ​​of 200 mg/dL or higher. Subsequently, the fasting plasma glucose level was adapted to this parameter, establishing 126 mg/dL for diagnosis. The highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting the development of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the studied populations (diagnosed by direct ophthalmoscopy or a single fundus photograph) is ≥126 mg/dL fasting and ≥200 mg/dL at 120 minutes of the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Does this rule out the possibility that a patient with 122 mg/dL fasting and 189 mg/dL at 120 minutes could develop microangiopathy? In this regard, the Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (DPP) detected DR in 7.9% of subjects with prediabetes (PDT2) after an average follow-up of 3.1 years, a figure that reached 14% 20 years after randomization.

Likewise, confocal corneal microscopy shows that 40% of people with PDT2 present with neuropathy. In addition, a recent meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of distal polyneuropathy in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) versus those with type 2 diabetes (T2D) due to impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) plus impaired fasting glucose (IFG) [1,249 subjects / 4 studies / OR 1.24 (95% CI 0.67–2.31) / I² 50.12%]6.

Furthermore, chronic kidney disease in T2D versus HbA1c <5% showed a hazard ratio of 1.08 (95% CI 1.02–1.14; P < 0.001)7. This demonstrates that all microvascular complications may already be present during T2D.

In the macrovascular domain, the DECODE Study Group concluded that the relationship between mortality and blood glucose levels is continuous and lacks a defined biological threshold8. Similarly, DeFronzo notes that individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and/or impaired fasting glucose (IFG) have a high risk of experiencing a cardiovascular event (CVD), which accounts for 80% of deaths in this group. These pathophysiological alterations are clearly expressed in subjects with IGT and/or IFG, where impaired β-cell function is observed, associated with dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, physical inactivity, insulin resistance, a procoagulant state, endothelial dysfunction, and inflammation

Individual risk should be differentiated not only by glycemic and HbA1c levels, but also according to the patient's particular phenotype: from those with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at low risk of complications and progression to those at high risk due to metabolic syndrome and steatotic liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction.

In conclusion, there is a fundamental confusion regarding the diagnosis of T2D and diabetes mellitus (DM), an assertion supported by solid evidence that maintains the impossibility of dividing them into two different nosological entities.

Author Biography

Víctor Commendatore, National University of the Northeast (UNNE), Paraná, Entre Ríos, Argentina

Endocrinologist

References

I. McCance DR, Hanson RL, Pettitt DJ, Bennett PH, Hadden DR, Knowler WC. Diagnosing diabetes mellitus: do we need new criteria? Diabetologia. 1997;40(3):247-255. doi:10.1007/s001250050671.

II. Gagliardino JJ. Los nuevos criterios para el diagnóstico y clasificación de la diabetes: ¿un desafío para el sector salud? Rev Soc Argent Diabetes. 1997;31(3).

III. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The prevalence of retinopathy in impaired glucose tolerance and recent-onset diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabet Med. 2007;24(2):137-144. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02043.x.

IV. White NH, Pan Q, Knowler WC, Schroeder EB, Dabelea D, Chew EY, et al. Risk factors for the development of retinopathy in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Program experience. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(11):2653-2661. doi:10.2337/dc22-0860.

V. Ziegler D, Herder C, Papanas N. Neuropathy in prediabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2023;39(8):e3693. doi:10.1002/dmrr.3693.

VI. Commendatore V, González CD. Frecuencia de polineuropatía durante la prediabetes: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis. Trabajo final de la Especialización en Metodología de la Investigación. Paraná: Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos; 2024.

VII. Honigberg MC, Zekavat SM, Pirruccello JP, Natarajan P, Vaduganathan M. Cardiovascular and kidney outcomes across the glycemic spectrum: insights from the UK Biobank. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78(5):453-464. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.004.

VIII. DECODE Study Group, European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Is the current definition for diabetes relevant to mortality risk from all causes and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases? Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):688-696. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.3.688.

IX. DeFronzo RA, Abdul-Ghani M. Assessment and treatment of cardiovascular risk in prediabetes: impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(3 Suppl):3B-24B. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.013.

Wagner R, Selvin E, Sehgal R, Prystupa K, Misra S, Fritsche A, et al. Beyond glucose: rethinking prediabetes for precision prevention. Diabetes Care. 2025. doi:10.2337/dci25-0054. Epub ahead of print.

Published

2026-10-01